The Overlooked Flaws in Web3’s Foundation

 Syndicated post by

While acknowledging that hashtag Roblox has effectively proven market demand, it’s essential to consider potential challenges, including concerns about the exploitation of the fanbase and the perceived lack of wealth sharing. There’s a growing consensus that profitability for creators can be challenging, with a significant buy-in acting as a potential barrier to entry. A similar concern is observed with Opensea, which may rely heavily on attracting those with substantial followings, posing potential sustainability issues. In the broader context of Web3, some companies may face challenges in adopting equitable profit-sharing models. This can impact the free market and hinder innovation. Clear and transparent terms are crucial for a thriving ecosystem.

Some Web3 companies could benefit from improving clarity in their revenue-sharing models to encourage fair participation. It’s important to highlight that Web3 aims to provide opportunities and accessibility for everyone, not just those dedicated to a single platform. By embracing the principles of Web3, we can work towards a more equitable and accessible future.

With the current state of Web3, it’s evident that there’s room for improvement, especially concerning wealth sharing within the Web3 community. Advocates for an egalitarian, fair, and open world should consider internalizing these values, fostering positive change within their organizations. That old adage rings true, “Be the change”….until then….